Opportunity Information
Funding Information
Award Information
Submission Information
Question Submission Information
Technical Assistance Session
Eligibility Information
Additional Information
Criteria
2026 Great Lakes Restoration Community Grant Program | Letter of Intent (LOI)
20-point framework based on Section 4 (Budget), Section 5 (Project Description), and the GLRCGP Review Framework in Appendix 3 (pages 13–14) of the draft 2027 RFA.
Scoring Framework
Review criterion | Corresponding application question | Maximum points |
Community Impact | Appendix 1, Section 5: Community Impact | 5 |
Alignment with Program Goals and Priorities | Appendix 1, Section 5: Alignment with the GLRI | 5 |
Feasibility | Appendix 1, Section 5: Description of Work and Timeline | 5 |
Budget | Appendix 1, Section 4: Budget (including required budget table) | 5 |
TOTAL |
| 20 |
Each criterion receives one score from 1 to 5. All four criteria are equally weighted (25% each). Scores are added for a maximum of 20 points.
Score | Rating | Description |
5 | Excellent | Clearly and thoroughly addresses the criterion with strong supporting information. |
4 | Good | Addresses the criterion well, with minor gaps or areas needing clarification. |
3 | Satisfactory | Adequately addresses the criterion but lacks some detail or clarity. |
2 | Limited | Partially addresses the criterion, with significant gaps or concerns. |
1 | Poor | Provides minimal information or does not adequately address the criterion. |
Review and Selection Process
Criterion-Specific Review Questions
Community Impact (5 points)
Project Narrative Form: Community Impact
To what extent does the project address community-identified environmental needs, demonstrate community involvement and engagement, and provide positive environmental and community benefits?
Alignment with Program Goals and Priorities (5 points)
Project Narrative Form: Alignment with the GLRI
How well does the project align with GLRI goals and priorities and identify contributions to one or more applicable GLRI Measures of Progress?
Feasibility (5 points)
Project Narrative: Description of Work and Timeline
How feasible is the project based on the proposed tasks, implementation approach, responsible parties, timeline, and readiness to carry out the work?
Budget (5 points)
Budget Form: Budget
To what extent is the requested funding reasonable and appropriate in relation to the proposed activities, anticipated outcomes, and project scope?
Reviewer Scorecard (For reference only)
Criterion | Score (0–5) |
Community Impact | ____ / 5 |
Alignment with Program Goals and Priorities | ____ / 5 |
Feasibility | ____ / 5 |
Budget | ____ / 5 |
TOTAL | ____ / 20 |
Additional Review Notes
Project Summary, Project Team, and Real Estate Control and Permissions provide supporting context and are not scored separately. Eligibility and completeness will be screened independently of this rubric. Requests for a Working Capital Advance do not affect application scoring.
Anticipated Announcement Dates
November 9th, 2026 (Mon): | Letters of Intent (LOIs) Released & LOI Application link open |
Tuesday, November 17th at 12pm CST/ 1pm EST Thursday, December 3rd at 10am CST/ 11am EST
| Informational Webinars 12pm CST/1pm EST November 17thSession Registration:
10am CST/11am EST December 3rd Registration: |
January 15, 2027 (Fri): | LOIs due/submission deadline 5pm CST/6pm EST |
February 22nd, 2027 | LOI decision notification emails sent; invitations to submit full proposals; Office hours for accepted applicants |
April 9th, 2027 | Full proposals due 5pm CST/6pm EST |
Week of May 10th, 2027 | Full proposal notification emails sent |
May – June 2027 | Rolling virtual announcements with projects after grant agreements; Feedback provided upon request; Office hours for accepted applicants |
September 2027 | Subaward start dates |